Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cancer Risks: The Debate Continues - Université de Montpellier Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Trends in Cancer Année : 2016

Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cancer Risks: The Debate Continues

Résumé

Deciphering the relative contribution of intrinsic (e.g., genetic) and extrinsic (e.g., life style, environmental) risk factors in cancer development is crucial for strategizing cancer prevention. The recent publication by Wu and colleagues in Nature appears as an important contribution to the debate previously initiated by Tomasetti and Vogelstein in Science, who proposed that two-thirds of cancers can be attributed to random mutations and hence 'bad luck'. By contrast, Wu and colleagues, using four lines of evidence, suggest that cancer risk is dominated by extrinsic factors, and intrinsic risk factors only contribute marginally. The debate remains open, and an approach focusing on the evolutionary ecology of organs could provide crucial insights.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-02515196 , version 1 (23-03-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Fréderic Thomas, Benjamin Roche, Beata Ujvari. Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cancer Risks: The Debate Continues. Trends in Cancer, 2016, 2 (2), pp.68-69. ⟨10.1016/j.trecan.2016.01.004⟩. ⟨hal-02515196⟩
29 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More