Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cancer Risks: The Debate Continues

Abstract : Deciphering the relative contribution of intrinsic (e.g., genetic) and extrinsic (e.g., life style, environmental) risk factors in cancer development is crucial for strategizing cancer prevention. The recent publication by Wu and colleagues in Nature appears as an important contribution to the debate previously initiated by Tomasetti and Vogelstein in Science, who proposed that two-thirds of cancers can be attributed to random mutations and hence 'bad luck'. By contrast, Wu and colleagues, using four lines of evidence, suggest that cancer risk is dominated by extrinsic factors, and intrinsic risk factors only contribute marginally. The debate remains open, and an approach focusing on the evolutionary ecology of organs could provide crucial insights.
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02515196
Contributeur : Amandine Michel-Avella <>
Soumis le : lundi 23 mars 2020 - 13:04:54
Dernière modification le : mercredi 25 mars 2020 - 01:24:05

Identifiants

Citation

Fréderic Thomas, Benjamin Roche, Beata Ujvari. Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cancer Risks: The Debate Continues. Trends in Cancer, Cell Press, 2016, 2 (2), pp.68-69. ⟨10.1016/j.trecan.2016.01.004⟩. ⟨hal-02515196⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

94