Susceptibility vessel sign in the aster trial: higher recanalization rate and more favourable clinical outcome after first line stent retriever compared to contact aspiration
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: In the Aspiration vs. Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization (ASTER) trial, which evaluated contact aspiration (CA) versus stent retriever (SR) use as first-line technique, the impact of the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was studied to determine its influence on trial results.
METHODS: We included patients having undergone CA or SR for M1 or M2 occlusions, who were screened by MRI with T2*
RESULTS: Among the 202 patients included, 143 patients were SVS (+) (70.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.5% to 77.1%). Overall, there was no difference in angiographic and clinical outcomes according to SVS status. However, compared to SR, CA achieved a lower mTICI 2c/3 rate in SVS (+) patients (risk ratio [RR] for CA vs. SR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.71) but not in SVS (-) (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.77; PP
CONCLUSIONS: As a first line strategy, SR achieved higher recanalization rates and a more favourable clinical outcome at 3 months compared to CA when MRI shows SVS within the thrombus.
| Origine | Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte |
|---|
Loading...
