Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Natural resistance to cancers: a Darwinian hypothesis to explain Peto’s paradox

Abstract : Background: Peto's paradox stipulates that there is no association between body mass (a surrogate of number of cells and longevity) and cancer prevalence in wildlife species. Resolving this paradox is a very promising research direction to understand mechanisms of cancer resistance. As of present, research has been focused on the consequences of these evolutionary pressures rather than of their causes. Discussion: Here, we argue that evolution through natural selection may have shaped mechanisms of cancer resistance in wildlife species and that this can result in a threshold in body mass above which oncogenic and tumor suppressive mechanisms should be increasingly purified and positively selected, respectively. Summary: We conclude that assessing wildlife species in their natural ecosystems, especially through theoretical modeling, is the most promising way to understand how evolutionary processes can favor one or the other pathway. This will provide important insights into mechanisms of cancer resistance.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [22 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Anthony Herrada <>
Soumis le : lundi 9 mars 2020 - 13:47:15
Dernière modification le : mardi 17 mars 2020 - 16:33:54


Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte


Distributed under a Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International License



Benjamin Roche, Michael Hochberg, Aleah Caulin, Carlo Maley, Robert Gatenby, et al.. Natural resistance to cancers: a Darwinian hypothesis to explain Peto’s paradox. BMC Cancer, BioMed Central, 2012, 12, pp.387. ⟨10.1186/1471-2407-12-387⟩. ⟨hal-02502607⟩



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers