Is a 'bad individual' more condemnable than several 'bad individuals'? Examining the scope-severity paradox - Université de Montpellier Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Review of Law and Economics Année : 2020

Is a 'bad individual' more condemnable than several 'bad individuals'? Examining the scope-severity paradox

Résumé

Previous literature found empirical evidence to the scope-severity paradox (SSP), corresponding to situations where the perceived harm of a wrongdoing or crime decreases with the number of victims. We examine this phenomenon for the perpetrators’ side. Using a survey experiment, we examine whether increasing the number of perpetrators of a crime, namely a fraud, decreases its perceived severity (and subsequent punishment) at the individual level. Two scenarios are examined corresponding to two kinds of fraud: a fraud committed by a financial adviser against his/her own employer (scenario 1) and a tax evasion by an executive (scenario 2). Overall, our results do not offer a clear-cut support for the scope-severity paradox for the perpetrators’ side, even if some secondary results can be indicative of a possible SSP in some circumstances. More precisely, in the case of a financial fraud, the stated severity increases when the number of perpetrators is low. We discuss the implications of our results and raise important issues for future research.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2020_RLE_Grolleau_Ibanez_Mzoughi_SSP.pdf (1.79 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-02448914 , version 1 (17-07-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Gilles Grolleau, Lisette Ibanez, Naoufel Mzoughi. Is a 'bad individual' more condemnable than several 'bad individuals'? Examining the scope-severity paradox. Review of Law and Economics, 2020, 16 (3), ⟨10.1515/rle-2019-0017⟩. ⟨hal-02448914⟩
63 Consultations
33 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More