Specific yield comparison between the two layers of a hard-rock aquifer model with Advar, a new quality-of-fit criterion
Résumé
Hard-rock aquifers (HRA) have long been considered to be two-layer systems, with a mostly
capacitive layer just below the surface, the saprolite layer, and a mainly transmissive layer
underneath, the fissured layer. Although this hydrogeological conceptual model now attracts a wide
consensus within the scientific community, it is difficult to prove that it can be efficient in terms of
deterministic modelling, especially with an equivalent porous medium model, w hich would not be the
first choice for “fractured aquifers”. In order to investigate the storage capacities of both layers and the
recharge, a deterministic hydrogeological model was used on a HRA to calibrate the specific yield of
each layer. The application site is the Plancoët migmatitic aquifer located in north-western Brittany,
France, with piezometric data from 40 observation wells surveyed every two weeks for eight years.
When the variance, the most common quality-of-fit criterion used in inverse calibration methods, was
found to be inefficient for calibrating the specific yield and the recharge together, Advar , a new
quality-of-fit criterion based on the seasonal piezometric amplitude variation, was developed and
calculated for a set of 512 simulation results. Contrary to the variance, it is able to define the best
values for the recharge and the specific yield in each layer. Adding to the conclusion that this two-layer
model is well suited to such a HRA, it is demonstrated that the saprolite is about 2.5 times more
capacitive than the fissured layer.